Introduction
Welcome to the Ballot Box Scores! In this political season, we've decided to have a bit of fun with the serious business of Senate races. Much like your favorite baseball stats, our Ballot Box Scores break down the key elements of each race: fundraising, cash on hand, polling data, and historical results. We promise no curveballs—just straight-up analysis to help you understand who's hitting home runs and who's striking out in the 2024 Senate races. So grab some popcorn, sit back, and let's play ball!
Understanding the Scores
Our scores are not a simple 1-100 scale. Instead, they combine several factors to give a comprehensive picture of each candidate's position in the race. A higher score generally indicates a stronger position. Here's what the scores mean:
- 35-40+: Strong position, likely to lead the race.
- 30-35: Competitive position, could go either way.
- 25-30: Needs improvement, trailing in key areas.
- Below 25: Weak position, significant challenges to overcome.
The scores reflect a combination of fundraising prowess, cash reserves, current polling, recent momentum, and past election performance, giving you a holistic view of the campaign's strength. These scores are updated with the latest data, polling, and fundraising information.
Arizona Senate Race: Ruben Gallego (D) vs. Kari Lake (R)
Commentary: With a substantial fundraising lead and positive polling momentum, Gallego appears to be in a strong position.
Democrat
Fundraising: $20,541,850
Cash on Hand: $9,648,718
Polling: 44.67%
Polling Momentum: +2.67
Historical Results: 50%
Republican
Fundraising: $9,935,179
Cash on Hand: $2,793,764
Polling: 42%
Polling Momentum: -0.33
Historical Results: 47.6%
Pennsylvania Senate Race: Bob Casey (D) vs. Dave McCormick (R)
Commentary: Casey's significant financial advantage and consistent polling give him a solid edge in this race.
Democrat
Fundraising: $23,316,572
Cash on Hand: $11,886,480
Polling: 49.67%
Polling Momentum: +7
Historical Results: 55.6%
Republican
Fundraising: $11,183,203
Cash on Hand: $6,491,678
Polling: 42.67%
Polling Momentum: -0.33
Historical Results: 44.4%
Nevada Senate Race: Jacky Rosen (D) vs. Sam Brown (R)
Commentary: Rosen maintains a steady lead, bolstered by her strong fundraising and cash on hand.
Democrat
Fundraising: $31,085,094
Cash on Hand: $9,487,523
Polling: 48.33%
Polling Momentum: +7
Historical Results: 50.4%
Republican
Fundraising: $7,144,474
Cash on Hand: $2,501,562
Polling: 41.33%
Polling Momentum: -6
Historical Results: 45.4%
Wisconsin Senate Race: Tammy Baldwin (D) vs. Eric Hovde (R)
Commentary: Baldwin's strong polling and positive momentum make her the clear frontrunner in this contest.
Democrat
Fundraising: $26,051,695
Cash on Hand: $10,251,350
Polling: 49%
Polling Momentum: +5
Historical Results: 55.4%
Republican
Fundraising: $9,069,811
Cash on Hand: $5,349,512
Polling: 44%
Polling Momentum: -2.67
Historical Results: 44.6%
Methodology
Our Ballot Box Scores use a comprehensive scoring model based on fundraising, cash on hand, current polling, polling momentum, and historical election results. Here’s a breakdown of how we calculate our scores:
Fundraising
Source: Federal Election Commission (FEC) data.
Calculation: Total fundraising amounts weighted as 15% of the total score.
Cash on Hand
Source: Federal Election Commission (FEC) data.
Calculation: Cash on hand weighted at 10% of the total score.
Current Polling
Sources: RealClearPolitics, NY Times/Siena College, Quinnipiac, Emerson College.
Calculation: Latest polling data weighted at 40% of the total score.
Polling Momentum
Calculation: Sum of differences between consecutive polls to determine momentum, weighted at 15% of the total score.
Historical Election Results
Source: Ballotpedia
Calculation: Results from the last comparable election to provide context.
Validation
Historical Validation
We applied the model to key Senate races from the 2018 and 2022 election cycles. Our predicted scores were compared to actual outcomes, showing that candidates with higher scores generally won, validating the model's effectiveness.
Time-Based Accuracy
As the election date approaches, polling data becomes more reflective of voter intentions, and financial data's predictive power increases. Tracking polling momentum closer to the election highlights critical last-minute trends.
Results and Confidence
Our model consistently predicts election outcomes accurately. Incorporating more recent data and adjusting for polling momentum improves accuracy, making our Ballot Box Scores a reliable tool for understanding the dynamics of Senate races.
Senate Ballot Box Scores
Comments