The resilience of democracy depends on its citizens’ trust in the process by which they elect their leaders. Yet, a phantom menace has haunted America’s political landscape for years, a shadowy specter of so-called "widespread election fraud." It is a mirage conjured not by evidence but by those who find utility in fomenting distrust, those who see personal gain in undermining democracy’s very foundation. And as far as phantoms go, this one has staying power—not because it is real, but because it serves a political purpose.
The idea of rampant election fraud has been trotted out periodically in the United States, often with little to no basis in reality. Yet it has now reached a crescendo, repeated with such fervor and frequency that, in the minds of some, it has attained a sort of mythological status. We hear it from candidates, self-styled populists, and assorted influencers of the right, who insist, not just against evidence but in blatant ignorance of it, that “the system is rigged.” In this telling, millions of "phantom votes" and “illegal ballots” have been cast, an extraordinary claim that has withstood, time and again, the puncturing scrutiny of courts and investigators alike.
Consider, for instance, the now-exhausted saga of the 2020 presidential election, an election that was litigated, examined, and recounted in detail. What did these investigations find? Courts from Pennsylvania to Arizona, Georgia to Michigan found virtually no evidence of the kind of systemic fraud that would change an election outcome. In fact, nearly every allegation of widespread fraud—assertions made loudly and persistently—wilted under the light of even minimal scrutiny. Even those appointed by Trump to lead departments responsible for election integrity—such as former Attorney General William Barr—were clear: there was no significant fraud.
To hear some tell it, however, this lack of evidence is immaterial, almost irrelevant. The ghost of election fraud continues to haunt, not because it is there but because it is useful. In fact, as the 2020 election deniers often refuse to mention, the most recent cases of verified fraud reveal precisely the opposite: that systemic, organized fraud is rare and that minor cases of wrongdoing often benefit those who shout the loudest about a “stolen election.”
A recent, notable example comes from 2023 in a Colorado county where a prominent election denier allegedly tampered with voting machines—a case not of votes mysteriously appearing but of an individual attempting to engineer the process to fit a predetermined narrative of corruption. In 2021, a former mayor in Mississippi was found guilty of voter fraud, forging absentee ballots. Here was fraud, yes, but not a grand conspiracy against the American voter; these isolated incidents illustrate instead the work of lone actors or small groups, typically incapable of affecting a federal election's outcome. The big lie—pushed in press conferences and social media tirades—continues not because it is true but because it serves a political class eager to erode trust in democratic institutions.
A democracy cannot function if the bedrock of its legitimacy—its elections—becomes, in the public mind, suspect. Today’s political climate is one in which casting doubt on electoral outcomes has become a strategic maneuver, a tool wielded not to enhance democracy but to destabilize it. Those who claim that they “speak for the people” by railing against “fraud” are, in reality, betraying them. They foster fear, distrust, and, ultimately, civic apathy. In a curious turn of fate, those who claim they wish to “save” democracy are the very ones eroding its pillars.
What does it mean to create such a specter? It means to turn election integrity into a weapon, a cudgel that can be used to cast doubt upon any unwelcome outcome. It means to prioritize individual ambition over collective good, to trade integrity for influence, and to corrode the very processes by which free people consent to be governed. This specter of election fraud is, in truth, a self-serving mirage—a political ghost that haunts, not because it is real, but because it is effective.
The danger, then, is not merely the persistence of a baseless conspiracy theory but the fact that it is invoked to justify undemocratic measures. Since 2020, dozens of new voting laws have been proposed and, in some states, enacted under the guise of protecting election integrity. But these measures frequently make voting more difficult, not more secure. Barriers to mail-in ballots, restrictions on drop boxes, curtailed hours for early voting—all are steps not toward democracy, but away from it. They are justified by appealing to fears that are as substantive as a wisp of smoke.
The solution lies not in debating whether fraud exists—small, isolated incidents will always occur—but in recognizing the specter for what it is: a political tool wielded cynically, designed to make people question the value of their vote and the legitimacy of their government. This manipulation of the democratic process for political gain is far more dangerous to our republic than any isolated instance of fraud could ever be.
It is time to dispel this phantom. America’s elections, flawed though they may be in minor ways, remain among the most transparent and reliable processes in the world. Our job as citizens, then, is not to follow those who would lead us down a path of doubt and discord. Instead, we must recognize that the ghost of election fraud is nothing more than an illusion, a fiction employed to advance the ambitions of those whose loyalty lies not with democracy but with their own power. The sooner we understand that, the sooner we can turn our gaze to building a democracy that deserves our confidence
Senate Ballot Box Scores
Comments