Barack Obama’s latest oratory performance at the Democratic National Convention was nothing short of a masterclass in rhetorical flourish, though it sadly fell short in the realm of substantive policy. If you were hoping for a blueprint for the future, what you got was more of a sermon from a charismatic preacher, replete with soaring rhetoric and scant details on how to actually fix anything.
From the moment Obama took the stage, it was clear we were in for a sermon. He opened with the kind of high-minded rhetoric that’s best served with a side of emotional fluff. “The state of our democracy has never been so fragile. But we can still rise to the occasion and prove that we are capable of extraordinary things,” he proclaimed. If only his call to action had the same depth as his penchant for dramatic flourishes. The speech was less about pragmatic solutions and more about elevating platitudes to an art form.
Obama’s lecture on unity, though undoubtedly stirring, was conspicuously devoid of practical measures. “We must restore our faith in the idea that we can do big things, not just as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans,” he said. Inspirational, yes—but practical? Not so much. One might wonder if he expects us to hold hands and chant until our problems magically solve themselves.
His criticism of Donald Trump was another highlight of the evening. Obama excoriated Trump’s administration for being all “showmanship” with a critical yet decidedly unsubstantial retort: “We’ve seen a lot of showmanship, but we need real leadership.” Such a statement might have carried more weight if it was accompanied by a coherent vision of what this “real leadership” would entail. Instead, it was like calling out a magician for not providing a real magic show, while offering nothing but a vague promise of a better act.
Obama’s praise for Kamala Harris was another exercise in empty praise. He lauded Harris as a “fierce advocate for justice and progress,” yet provided no insight into how her past actions align with the lofty ideals he was promoting. This praise read more like a political pat on the back than a rigorous defense of her qualifications. It was as though he expected the audience to simply accept her as a champion of justice on faith alone, with no critical examination of her record or present-day effectiveness.
The former president’s call to action for grassroots engagement was perhaps the most perplexing segment of the speech. “It’s up to us to rebuild our communities and fight for the future we believe in,” Obama declared. This, of course, is a familiar rallying cry, but it’s also notably vague. The complexities of today’s political and social issues are hardly addressed with a plea for individual commitment and collective action. It’s a call to mobilize without providing any real direction on what needs to be done or how to get it accomplished.
To his credit, Obama’s speech was filled with the kind of eloquence and charm that has become his trademark. He knows how to spin a yarn and inspire with a well-placed metaphor or heartfelt anecdote. But when it comes to addressing the pressing issues facing the nation, his speech felt like a sophisticated exercise in evasion. His oratory skills might have dazzled, but the content was lacking in substance.
In sum, Obama’s DNC speech was a showcase of rhetorical prowess that, regrettably, missed the mark on offering substantive solutions. It was a grandiose sermon that inspired with its eloquence but faltered in providing actionable insights. For all the talk of unity and restoration, one couldn’t help but wish that the speech had delivered more than just a call to feel-good action and less on the specifics of policy and governance. If this is the new standard for political discourse, we might as well settle in for a future where high-flown rhetoric becomes the norm, while practical solutions remain conspicuously absent.
Comments