SEARCH

2024 Senate Ballot Box Scores

Introduction

Welcome to the Ballot Box Scores! In this political season, we've decided to have a bit of fun with the serious business of Senate races. Much like your favorite baseball stats, our Ballot Box Scores break down the key elements of each race: fundraising, cash on hand, polling data, and historical results. We promise no curveballs—just straight-up analysis to help you understand who's hitting home runs and who's striking out in the 2024 Senate races. So grab some popcorn, sit back, and let's play ball!

Understanding the Scores

Our scores are not a simple 1-100 scale. Instead, they combine several factors to give a comprehensive picture of each candidate's position in the race. A higher score generally indicates a stronger position. Here's what the scores mean:

  • 35-40+: Strong position, likely to lead the race.
  • 30-35: Competitive position, could go either way.
  • 25-30: Needs improvement, trailing in key areas.
  • Below 25: Weak position, significant challenges to overcome.

The scores reflect a combination of fundraising prowess, cash reserves, current polling, recent momentum, and past election performance, giving you a holistic view of the campaign's strength.

Arizona Senate Race: Ruben Gallego (D) vs. Kari Lake (R)

Commentary: With a substantial fundraising lead and positive polling momentum, Gallego appears to be in a strong position.

Ruben Gallego
Democrat

Fundraising: $20.82 million
Cash on Hand: $9.65 million
Polling: 49%
Polling Momentum: +4
Historical Results: 50%
Overall Score: 29.088
Kari Lake
Republican

Fundraising: $5.70 million
Cash on Hand: $2.52 million
Polling: 36%
Polling Momentum: -7
Historical Results: 47.6%
Overall Score: 19.567
Gallego leading (+9.521 over Lake) 📈

Pennsylvania Senate Race: Bob Casey (D) vs. David McCormick (R)

Commentary: Casey's significant financial advantage and consistent polling give him a solid edge in this race.

Bob Casey
Democrat

Fundraising: $23.79 million
Cash on Hand: $11.89 million
Polling: 49%
Polling Momentum: +4
Historical Results: 55.6%
Overall Score: 30.318
David McCormick
Republican

Fundraising: $11.07 million
Cash on Hand: $6.41 million
Polling: 41%
Polling Momentum: 0
Historical Results: 44.4%
Overall Score: 23.142
Casey leading (+7.176 over McCormick)📈

Nevada Senate Race: Jacky Rosen (D) vs. Sam Brown (R)

Commentary: Rosen maintains a steady lead, bolstered by her strong fundraising and cash on hand.

Jacky Rosen
Democrat

Fundraising: $25.32 million
Cash on Hand: $10.20 million
Polling: 45%
Polling Momentum: 0
Historical Results: 50.4%
Overall Score: 27.858
Sam Brown
Republican

Fundraising: $8.22 million
Cash on Hand: $4.22 million
Polling: 37%
Polling Momentum: -6
Historical Results: 45.4%
Overall Score: 20.395
Rosen leading (+7.463 over Brown)📈

Wisconsin Senate Race: Tammy Baldwin (D) vs. Eric Hovde (R)

Commentary: Baldwin's strong polling and positive momentum make her the clear frontrunner in this contest.

Tammy Baldwin
Democrat

Fundraising: $22.49 million
Cash on Hand: $12.35 million
Polling: 54%
Polling Momentum: +8
Historical Results: 55.4%
Overall Score: 32.548
Eric Hovde
Republican

Fundraising: $10.55 million
Cash on Hand: $5.68 million
Polling: 42%
Polling Momentum: -1
Historical Results: 44.6%
Overall Score: 23.311
Baldwin leading (+9.237 over Hovde)📈


 

Methodology

Our Ballot Box Scores use a comprehensive scoring model based on fundraising, cash on hand, current polling, polling momentum, and historical election results. Here’s a breakdown of how we calculate our scores:

Fundraising

Source: Federal Election Commission (FEC) data.

Calculation: Total fundraising amounts weighted as 15% of the total score.

Cash on Hand

Source: Federal Election Commission (FEC) data.

Calculation: Cash on hand weighted at 10% of the total score.

Current Polling

Sources: RealClearPolitics, NY Times/Siena College, Quinnipiac, Emerson College.

Calculation: Latest polling data weighted at 40% of the total score.

Polling Momentum

Calculation: Sum of differences between consecutive polls to determine momentum, weighted at 15% of the total score.

Historical Election Results

Source: Ballotpedia

Calculation: Results from the last comparable election to provide context.

Validation

Historical Validation

We applied the model to key Senate races from the 2018 and 2022 election cycles. Our predicted scores were compared to actual outcomes, showing that candidates with higher scores generally won, validating the model's effectiveness.

Time-Based Accuracy

As the election date approaches, polling data becomes more reflective of voter intentions, and financial data's predictive power increases. Tracking polling momentum closer to the election highlights critical last-minute trends.

Results and Confidence

Our model consistently predicts election outcomes accurately. Incorporating more recent data and adjusting for polling momentum improves accuracy, making our Ballot Box Scores a reliable tool for understanding the dynamics of Senate races.

© 2024 campaignchronicle.com - All Rights Reserved