As the din of modern American politics intensifies, one might wish that moments of national crisis—particularly natural disasters—could remain insulated from the corrosive forces of misinformation and political theater. Yet, with an exasperating predictability, former President Donald Trump has once again demonstrated his deftness for exploiting tragedy for electoral gain, this time by brazenly distorting the federal response to Hurricane Helene.
Trump, ever the showman, has introduced a dangerous fiction to his base: the grotesque claim that Vice President Kamala Harris "didn’t send anything or anyone" to assist the victims of the hurricane, and worse still, that helicopters attempting to save lives were turned back under her indifferent watch. These claims are not just false; they are inflammatory distortions designed to fan the flames of partisan resentment and distrust.
Hurricane Helene, which has ravaged parts of North Carolina and claimed too many lives, should evoke unity, resolve, and compassion from our political leaders. Instead, Trump has chosen to engage in what can only be called a politicization of human suffering. By casting Harris and the Biden administration as uncaring villains, he seeks to score political points in the final stretch before Election Day. This cynical tactic, which plays fast and loose with facts, has become a hallmark of Trump’s political playbook.
In truth, the federal response to Hurricane Helene has been praised by Republicans and Democrats alike, with officials from both parties commending the efforts of rescue workers and the coordination between state and federal agencies. Private helicopters have indeed been active in the rescue effort, but so too have government helicopters, disproving Trump’s claim of federal inaction. The image he paints—of families left to die as a callous administration turned a blind eye—has no basis in reality.
To suggest, as Trump did, that the private sector was the only entity providing meaningful help is a disservice to the thousands of government workers, first responders, and volunteers who have risked their lives to save others. It is also a deliberate mischaracterization of a disaster relief apparatus that is working, under trying conditions, to minimize loss and rebuild shattered communities.
Trump’s manipulation of this tragedy is not surprising, but it is nonetheless dispiriting. He knows that in the realm of post-truth politics, the facts are secondary to the visceral appeal of his accusations. But in doing so, he not only insults the dignity of those who have suffered and died in this disaster, he also erodes the nation’s trust in its institutions—institutions that, for all their flaws, remain the bedrock of our civic life.
One must wonder whether Trump’s continual reliance on misinformation speaks to a deeper issue: the realization that his policies and ideas, divorced from the grandstanding and hyperbole, hold limited appeal to a broad swath of the electorate. Instead of offering constructive solutions, he peddles narratives that cast his opponents as morally and fundamentally bankrupt—whether they are or not is immaterial. In Trump’s world, it is enough to say something loudly, insistently, and often enough to make it feel true.
Natural disasters, however, do not bend to the will of political spin. They are relentless and impartial, exacting a toll on lives, infrastructure, and human spirit. The federal response to them, likewise, must be as immune to political gamesmanship as possible. It should unite us, not divide us further. And yet here we are, with Trump weaponizing a hurricane to deepen the nation’s polarization.
This episode is a reminder of the cost of our degraded political discourse. We are no longer able to discuss, much less solve, problems based on a shared understanding of the facts. Instead, too often we are reduced to warring tribes, each locked in our own bubble of truth, fortified by partisan media and political leaders who, like Trump, care more about winning than about governance.
One might hope that in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, we could find a way to focus on recovery, on rebuilding lives and communities, rather than descending further into the morass of partisan bitterness. Yet, as Trump’s rhetoric suggests, that hope may be increasingly far-fetched in today’s America. As we turn the corner into the final weeks before Election Day, the stakes of this election should be clear: It is not merely about choosing one party over another, but about choosing between a politics of truth and a politics of manipulation.
Our republic, fragile as it is, deserves better.
Senate Ballot Box Scores
Comments