In what may be one of the most scrutinized moves in media regulation, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has fast-tracked the approval of George Soros’ acquisition of a significant stake in Audacy’s radio stations. Soros, a billionaire philanthropist with a well-documented history of supporting left-wing causes, would indirectly gain influence over more than 200 radio stations in 40 markets, reaching 165 million Americans. This move, happening just weeks before the 2024 election, has ignited a firestorm of criticism, especially from conservative quarters, and raises profound concerns about the future of media neutrality and electoral integrity.
At the heart of this controversy is the process by which the FCC approved the deal. According to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr, the agency bypassed its traditional national security review process, effectively "cutting corners." In an era where foreign ownership of media is closely scrutinized, Carr’s statement that “the cart came before the horse this time” is more than just an expression of frustration—it underscores a serious breach of regulatory norms, one that could have a long-lasting impact on the trustworthiness of U.S. media.
George Soros’ involvement in American politics is nothing new. His Open Society Foundations have poured billions into progressive causes and candidates, making him a kingmaker on the left. However, his media investments take his influence to another level. Audacy’s extensive reach across the country, in major media markets, positions Soros to shape public discourse at a time when media bias is already a pressing concern. As Comer and Langworthy of the House Oversight Committee have noted, Soros has sought to “consolidate control over the airwaves,” a charge that rings alarmingly true in light of this FCC decision.
What is particularly troubling is that radio remains a powerful medium in American culture. Despite the rise of digital platforms, radio commands more media consumption than even television. With Soros potentially having a major stake in a company that owns stations across key battleground states, one cannot help but wonder if the FCC’s accelerated approval process is facilitating political influence on a scale previously unseen.
Supporters of the deal, and even some inside the FCC, argue that this isn’t an unprecedented move. They point to bankruptcy proceedings under the Trump administration that involved similar media acquisitions, such as iHeartMedia and Cumulus Media. However, these comparisons ring hollow. In those cases, there was no comparable figure to Soros—whose political activities are overt and controversial—involved in shaping the future of the American airwaves.
Moreover, the speed at which the FCC moved on this approval raises eyebrows. The transfer of licenses typically requires a national security review that could take up to six months. Yet, with Soros in the picture and an election just around the corner, the FCC seems to have made an exception. This is not just about following process for the sake of procedure—it’s about maintaining the integrity of American media, free from undue influence by one political faction or ideology.
The timing of this deal makes the stakes even higher. In the run-up to the 2024 presidential election, the media's influence on public opinion and voter turnout will be crucial. Radio stations in key swing states have the power to sway undecided voters, particularly among working-class Americans who are more likely to tune in while commuting or at work. With Soros at the helm of hundreds of these stations, one must ask: What kind of narrative will be pushed in the lead-up to November?
The contrast between Trump and Harris on foreign policy, NATO, and Ukraine already dominates the headlines. Imagine how amplified these debates will become if one side has significant control over the airwaves in battleground states. Audacy’s reach could become a tool for shifting public opinion, especially in the tightly contested electoral landscape we now inhabit.
The FCC’s decision should alarm anyone who believes in a free and balanced press. Media ownership, particularly in a country where political polarization is already at dangerous levels, should not be allowed to become a tool for ideological manipulation. Soros has every right to participate in the democratic process, but when regulatory bodies expedite media acquisitions, particularly by politically motivated figures, it corrodes the public trust.
Conservatives have long warned about the dangers of a media environment dominated by left-wing voices. The acceleration of this deal reinforces these fears. It is not just about what George Soros might do with his newly acquired media empire—it is about the broader principle of fairness in public discourse. The FCC has set a precedent, and one wonders if this same leniency would have been afforded to a conservative billionaire looking to expand their media holdings in a comparable manner.
The FCC’s decision to green-light George Soros’ acquisition of Audacy’s radio stations represents a troubling moment in American media regulation. With one of the most politically active billionaires poised to control a significant portion of the airwaves, the integrity of our media and the fairness of the 2024 election are at stake. The fact that the FCC seems to have fast-tracked this deal only deepens the concerns about political favoritism and regulatory overreach.
As we move forward, conservatives must remain vigilant in defending the principles of free speech and balanced media. The airwaves belong to the American people—not to one billionaire with a political agenda.
Senate Ballot Box Scores
Comments