Donald Trump, in a rhetorical flourish that has become his trademark, has once again dusted off the economic bludgeon of tariffs. Proclaiming on Truth Social his intention to impose sweeping levies on imports from Mexico, Canada, and China, the former president has laid bare a vision of economic nationalism that is as dangerous as it is illiberal. It is a vision that, if implemented, risks undermining the principles of free trade that have underpinned American prosperity and global stability for decades.
Tariffs as Economic Masochism
Let us begin with the basics: tariffs are a tax. They are not levied on foreign governments or manufacturers but on American consumers and businesses. A 25% tariff on goods from Mexico and Canada, for example, will not be paid by factories in Monterrey or Vancouver but by families in Milwaukee and Atlanta, who will face higher prices on everything from cars to building materials.
The numbers are staggering. Economists estimate that proposed tariffs could cost Americans $78 billion annually. A $50 pair of shoes might rise to $65; a $2,000 mattress could jump by $190. These are not abstract figures—they represent real burdens on households already grappling with inflation and economic uncertainty.
The Myth of Economic Retribution
Trump frames his tariff proposals as a form of payback—a means of forcing other nations to “finally, after 75 years, pay us back for all that we’ve done for the world.” This framing, though rhetorically potent, is economically nonsensical. Trade is not tribute; it is the voluntary exchange of goods and services that benefits all parties involved.
The United States has long been a leader in promoting free trade, not out of altruism but because it is in our national interest. Trade agreements such as the USMCA (ironically negotiated during Trump’s first term) have created millions of jobs and strengthened American industries by opening access to foreign markets. Tariffs, by contrast, close those markets, invite retaliation, and disrupt the supply chains on which our economy depends.
The Fentanyl Non Sequitur
Trump’s justification for tariffs on China is particularly troubling. He argues that higher tariffs are necessary to pressure Beijing to stop the flow of fentanyl into the United States. This is a non sequitur of staggering proportions. Fentanyl is a public health crisis requiring robust law enforcement, diplomatic cooperation, and treatment strategies. Punishing American businesses and consumers with tariffs does nothing to address the root causes of this scourge.
China’s role in the fentanyl crisis is undeniable, but so too is the need for bilateral efforts to combat it. Indeed, recent steps taken under the Biden administration to resume counternarcotics cooperation with China demonstrate that progress is possible through diplomacy rather than economic self-harm.
A Betrayal of Free-Market Principles
The imposition of tariffs is not just economically misguided—it is ideologically illiberal. The United States, a nation built on the principles of individual liberty and free enterprise, should reject policies that empower the government to interfere arbitrarily in the marketplace. Tariffs distort prices, pick winners and losers, and invite corruption and cronyism.
Moreover, tariffs are a betrayal of the conservative principles Trump claims to champion. For decades, conservatives have rightly argued that free markets, not government interventions, are the engines of economic growth and innovation. By embracing tariffs, Trump turns his back on this intellectual tradition, opting instead for a populist protectionism that undermines economic liberty.
The Geopolitical Cost of Protectionism
Beyond their domestic impact, Trump’s tariffs threaten to undermine America’s global leadership. The United States has long been the architect of a rules-based international order that has fostered unprecedented levels of global trade and economic integration. By unilaterally imposing tariffs that likely violate agreements such as the USMCA, Trump risks eroding the trust and cooperation that underpin this system.
The geopolitical implications are profound. Retaliatory tariffs from Mexico, Canada, and China are inevitable, as are disputes at the World Trade Organization. Such conflicts weaken alliances and embolden adversaries, creating opportunities for nations such as China to position themselves as champions of free trade in a world where the United States is retreating.
A Return to Principles
America must resist the siren song of protectionism. Instead of retreating into economic nationalism, we should double down on the principles of free trade that have made us a global economic powerhouse. This means rejecting tariffs and embracing policies that strengthen our competitiveness—investments in education, infrastructure, and innovation, coupled with reforms to modernize our trade agreements for the 21st century.
Trump’s tariff proposals are a dangerous gambit, but they also present an opportunity for a national conversation about the kind of economic future we want. Do we embrace the illiberal and self-defeating policies of protectionism, or do we reaffirm our commitment to the principles of free enterprise and open markets?
The answer, for the sake of American prosperity and leadership, must be the latter.
Senate Ballot Box Scores
Comments