The latest CNN/SSRS poll of six battleground states offers a revealing snapshot of the 2024 presidential race. As expected, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are locked in fierce competition across the critical states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Arizona. Yet, what stands out is the perception gap: while voters are deeply divided on who to support, they largely agree on one thing — they view Trump as the more significant threat.
According to the poll, 54% of swing-state voters describe Trump as "too extreme," with 46% seeing him as a "threat to the country." Harris, on the other hand, is viewed as "too extreme" by 44%, and 39% consider her a "threat." This gap suggests that while both candidates have their detractors, Trump is seen as the more dangerous of the two, a striking revelation as we inch closer to election day.
Why do so many voters, especially in these politically decisive states, see Trump as a larger threat? It may be a combination of his rhetoric and his history. Trump’s two impeachments, his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, and his involvement in the January 6 insurrection have painted him as a deeply polarizing figure. The fact that a majority of swing-state voters view him as "too extreme" is not surprising, given his tendency to stoke division, peddle conspiracy theories, and attack democratic institutions.
In contrast, Harris has never been the central figure in controversies of this magnitude. While some voters see her as "too extreme," largely because of her progressive positions on issues like criminal justice reform, climate change, and healthcare, she doesn't carry the same baggage as Trump. Her challenges lie more in overcoming the image of being a relatively inexperienced leader compared to Trump, who has four years in the Oval Office, albeit a tumultuous tenure.
The poll also underscores the complicated relationship many voters have with Trump. While a significant portion views him as a threat, he remains competitive, even leading Harris in Arizona and tying her in Pennsylvania. This contradiction points to a deeper issue: despite voters' reservations about Trump, many still see him as a preferable alternative to Harris, especially in states with strong conservative bases.
This duality suggests that Trump's brand of politics, however extreme, continues to appeal to a segment of the electorate that prioritizes policy over temperament. His populist messaging, promise of economic resurgence, and focus on border security resonate with many in battleground states, particularly in Arizona and Pennsylvania.
The poll numbers further highlight the closeness of the race. Harris holds narrow leads in key states like Wisconsin and Michigan, and even ekes out a one-point advantage in traditionally conservative Georgia and Nevada. That said, these leads are razor-thin and well within the margin of error. The tied race in Pennsylvania and Trump’s advantage in Arizona suggest that the path to victory for either candidate will be fraught with volatility.
Wisconsin and Michigan, two Rust Belt states that went to Trump in 2016 and flipped to Joe Biden in 2020, are pivotal. Harris’s leads there — 50% to 44% in Wisconsin and 48% to 43% in Michigan — reflect her appeal to voters seeking stability and continuity after Biden's presidency. But these margins are far from comfortable, especially given the unpredictability of voter turnout and the possibility of last-minute campaign developments.
Ultimately, this poll paints a clear picture: the 2024 election is not just a battle over policies but perceptions of existential threat. Trump may have a loyal base, but the majority of voters in these battleground states see him as a greater danger than Harris. This perception could give Harris an edge, particularly with moderate Republicans and independent voters who are weary of Trump’s disruptive political style.
However, Harris’s ability to capitalize on this sentiment will depend on how well she can define herself as a stabilizing force in contrast to Trump's volatility. If she can solidify her position as the candidate of reason and caution, she stands a chance of expanding her slim lead in key battlegrounds. If not, the race could swing back toward Trump, whose base remains energized despite the widespread belief that his presidency represents an ongoing threat to democratic norms.
The 2024 presidential race is shaping up to be a referendum on two divergent visions for America. Trump is the candidate of disruption, promising a return to his unique brand of governance. Harris, by contrast, positions herself as a steady hand in uncertain times, albeit one with progressive ideals that some voters find unsettling. But in the battle for the soul of America, the fact that more swing-state voters view Trump as the more dangerous candidate could be the decisive factor in a race that will likely be determined by the slimmest of margins.
The stakes are higher than ever, and this election will be as much about what voters fear as what they hope for.
Senate Ballot Box Scores
Comments