Articles

The solution is not to impose sweeping new regulations on political donations, nor is it to demonize those who spend their own money to support their beliefs. Rather, it is to reinvigorate the conservative message that elections are about ideas, principles, and values—not just the highest bidder.
Read More.

Royce White, a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate from Minnesota, is the latest example. In a resurfaced social media post, White declared that “the bad guys won” World War II, suggesting that the war’s outcome merely represented competing globalist and communist interests.
Read More.

Musk's growing influence demands scrutiny not just because of his political alliances, but because of the colossal power he wields over modern life.
Read More.

This is not politics in the sense that Lincoln or Churchill would recognize; it is theatrics, divorced from the true complexities of national defense.
Read More.

What is essential to grasp about January 6 is not simply the immediate danger Pence faced, but the broader implications for our political culture.
Read More.

In American political history, the term "October Surprise" refers to a significant event, revelation, or controversy that emerges in the final weeks before a U.S. presidential election, often shaping its outcome. These events—whether intentionally orchestrated or coincidental—can shift public opinion or political momentum during the critical closing weeks of a campaign. Over the years, several "October Surprises" have altered the course of U.S. elections, sometimes changing the trajectory of the presidency itself. In the 2024 election, a new potential October Surprise looms large: the release of documents in Special Counsel Jack Smith's case against Donald Trump.
Read More.

While vice-presidential debates typically don’t sway elections, the Vance-Walz faceoff offered a clear contrast in policy and philosophy, highlighting the ideological divide between conservative and progressive visions for America’s future.
Read More.

Jordan’s rise was fueled by his contempt for the status quo. First elected in 2006, he immediately set himself apart as a combative purist.
Read More.

Vice presidential debates often live in the shadow of the main event: the presidential face-offs. However, these encounters have produced memorable moments that have shaped public perceptions of the candidates and revealed the underlying tensions in American politics. Let’s take a look at some of the most memorable moments from past vice presidential debates that left a lasting impact.
Read More.

In the coming years, this tension between populism and traditional conservatism will shape the future of the Republican Party. The populist wave, while electorally potent, is ultimately self-limiting, dependent on the personality of one man rather than on a coherent set of ideas.
Read More.

In a political landscape increasingly marred by insults and grievance, both candidates stood as a testament to the fact that American politics can still be conducted with dignity.
Read More.

On this day, October 1, 1992, Ross Perot re-entered the U.S. presidential race as an independent candidate, marking one of the most significant third-party campaigns in modern American political history. Though initially a longshot, Perot's populist appeal, immense personal wealth, and unique ability to tap into widespread voter dissatisfaction with the political establishment turned him into a serious contender. His candidacy not only changed the dynamics of the 1992 election but also left a lasting legacy on the American political landscape, particularly regarding the role of third parties and independent candidates.
Read More.

Hogan’s tenure as governor was a beacon of competence, leadership, and integrity—qualities that Alsobrooks sorely lacks.
Read More.

Ultimately, this debate may be less about who lands the biggest punch and more about which candidate can appeal to the broader electorate’s desire for stability, economic security, and a sense of purpose.
Read More.

On September 30, 1938, the world witnessed a pivotal moment in history: the signing of the Treaty of Munich. This agreement, reached by the leaders of Germany, Britain, France, and Italy, permitted Adolf Hitler to annex the Sudetenland, a region of Czechoslovakia populated largely by ethnic Germans. The Munich Agreement is often cited as a classic example of the policy of appeasement, wherein Western democracies sought to maintain peace in Europe by conceding to the territorial demands of aggressive totalitarian regimes. While the immediate reaction to the Munich Agreement was one of relief, as it appeared to stave off war, its long-term implications were catastrophic, contributing to the outbreak of World War II and demonstrating the perils of appeasement—a lesson that resonates starkly in today's geopolitical climate, particularly concerning Russia's aggression towards Ukraine.
Read More.